Farewell to June!
This month just seems to have flown by, hasn't it? Well, maybe not for you, since every day you're waiting with bated breath for my next post (of which you only received four for the month), so it might have dragged a little. For me, though, it's gone quickly- ironically, decreasing my available blog time, thus making all of your months longer. It's a vicious cycle...
Well, my week was much like my month, going by very quickly. Honestly, Wednesday it felt like I no sooner got to work than it was time to leave. That's a very rare feeling that a work day passes before you know it, isn't it? Not all of us can be Jen Shylanski and love every moment of every day! ;)
Speaking of passing things, I received back my module grades from June. I passed two out of the three I took, thus bringing me up to a grand total of five advanced modules completed (each of which give me an additional awesome three bucks a paycheck!) The one I failed, New Accounts, has been a thorn in my side since April, but I have every confidence I'll defeat it next month.
In the pop culture category, Shelly and I watched Fiddler on the Roof last weekend. As musicals go, it was good. Unlike Rent, of which we sat through twenty minutes before the DVD player mercifully malfunctioned, the song writers actually went through the effort of making the lyrics clever and, more importantly, rhyming.
We've now reached a brief interlude in our Blockbuster queue. Shelly's picked all of the recent rentals we've seen, and now we're at a point where several of the next few are my choices! I'm tingling with excitement as I anticipate tonight's classic, Chased by Dinosaurs! Something tells me that, despite all my forbearance with musical after musical, I will be watching that one quite alone.
Also this week, I read a short novel entitled The Last Great Auk, which finished the joy-sapping job that Pursuit of Happiness began last month. One might argue that I shouldn't have gone into it expecting a happy ending, since the book's about a species of bird that went extinct over 160 years ago. I was kind of hoping for an M. Night Shyamalan-style twist at the end, even though that probably would have meant that readers could have figured it out by about page five. Either that, or maybe a Michael Crichton ending in which the bird wakes up in a labratory, magically resurrected by way of its DNA.
In entertainment news, Shelly and I visited Jason and Erika last night. Charlotte was asleep by our arrival and we never heard a peep out of her the whole evening. I suspected foul play, but was so grateful for a quiet evening with the new parents that I didn't make an issue of it.
We had a good time. In a rare turn of events, Erika was in the mood to play a game, so Jason brought out Scene-It. Three hours later, an exhausted Chris claimed victory, having endured endless travails, such as clips from Steel Magnolias, Buzz cards that inevitably set me back three spaces, and a furious spouse who accused me of foiling her win by distracting her. We should have known better than to play without Ashley Kuda, since no Scene-It game lasts more than 20 minutes with her participating.
In a short aside here, I read with interest this angst-ridden article about the recently concluded Supreme Court term. Especially egregious, in an article rife with distortions and hyperbole, is this passage:
And if conservatives claim to believe the president is owed deference on his
court appointees, they will be -- I choose this word deliberately -- lying. In
2005 conservatives had no problem blocking Bush's appointment of Harriet Miers
because they could not count on her to be a strong voice for their legal causes.
They revealed that their view of judicial battles is not about principle but
power. When they went after Miers, conservatives lost the deference argument.
Libs like E. J Dionne just love to have it both ways. One of their main critiques of the Bush Administration is that President Bush just offers up jobs to cronies that don’t have the experience or expertise to adequately perform them. The name of Michael Brown comes to mind.
In the example of Harriet Miers, she was a smart woman who had done well for herself in life, but she had never shown much of a desire or aptitude for the Supreme Court, and there were scads of conservative legal scholars who were more qualified for the position. If she’d been confirmed, Dionne would probably be first on the ‘cronyism’ bandwagon, but since Alito got the nod instead, he tries to use the incident as a reason conservative nominees shouldn’t be confirmed!
Not to run this subject into the ground here, but the ‘conservative’ position on judges has always been that, if judges are legally competant, have stellar credentials, haven’t done anything criminal or handed down any obviously ludicrious decisions, they should be confirmed regardless of whether the Senate approves of their particular judicial philosophy. Clinton got Ginsburg and Breyer through a Republican Senate, despite their liberal Constitutional views. If Bush gets another chance to put someone on the court, Democratic Senators owe him the same courtesy.
Ok, that aside wasn't so short, but cut me a little slack. When's the last time you had to sit through any political thoughts from me??
Well, gotta go. Just FYI, July might be a bad month for blogs, as Shelly and I will be out of town every weekend after next. But I'll do my best to keep up. Hope everyone's doing alright.
Oh, and use the 'comment' feature from time to time, people! That's why it's there!





